|
Do you need Linux?
Topic: Linux; Level: newbie
Eventually the revolutionaries become the established
culture, and then what will they do
-Linus torvalds
It is apt that I start such a topic with a quote from the
man who was one of the biggest influences in the growth of
the 'alternate' computing. If you are a person who keeps himself
reasonably up to date with the world of the Internet, and
the world of the computers in general, you would have heard
that there is this thing called Linux, that is making quite
a few, otherwise sane people, rather crazy.
You might also have realised that a lot of this crazy ire
is directed at a company at Redmond, and at a person who is
reported to have been the person who was in the garage that
lead to the whole thing. What is all this? Why should you
bother? Do you really need Linux?
| In this
section |
| QuaxWrite
home |
Dune by Frank Herbert
Dune - the series,
#1: Dune,
Terms of Dune
|
Article:
Travelogue: Rajasthan road trip,
The Philosophy of the Free & Open,
First Look at GMail,
w32.nimda.a@mm,
The business of OSS,
User Friendly?
|
Opinion:
The gig for the Gigabyte,
Do you need Linux?,
Why I dont trust M$,
M$ has no alternative |
Fiction:
The Purse,
Alice
|
Technical Papers: Analysis & Design of
RC Chimneys my B.Tech project, Using
WADIWRK4. |
|
A Revolutions Begins
Before we delve into questions such as these, a little background
only helps develop a perspective. And it never hurts.
The commercial world that is prevalent in times such as now,
have made a concept very important, "returns to investment".
Such a concept has left in its wake a tremendous amount of
muck and nonsense. Conventional wisdom says that if you spent
some time doing something, then your effort must be adequately
accounted for. It therefore does not make sense to give away
hours of your time, which you could have spent in other ways
more profitable, as a faceless, nameless entity who works
so that others' world is made simpler and more productive.
That is what a number of people are now doing, as the many
programmers for the present day miracle called Linux, whose
users are an estimated 7 to 8 million. It all started in 1991,
when Linus Torvalds a 21-year-old computer science student
at the University of Helsinki, decided that his personal operating
system, Minix,
a Unix-look-alike operating system was not good enough. He
was pretty sure he could write something better. So in a very
brave and foolish attempt started to write his own. But in
doing this he made am important decision, to involve people.
He took the help of a number of the
news groups at that time, to ask for ideas and guidance.
Then he did something unbelievable. He put up all his work
on the Internet, source code et all, and asked for people
to download the same and modify it to increase its functionality.
What happenned then was something that could not be predicted.
The 'netlanders' decided to fall in love with this unique
experiment of writing a fully free and multifunctional version
of 'minix'. You will find a number of pre 1.0 release posts
by Linus here. From a recognition
of the fact that he needed the help of the unknown people
to help him with his project, to the decision to put up the
work as a tribute to all those who contributed, was the step
that changed the face of things to come.
|
Some of the early pioneers
In the early 1980s, Richard
Stallman founded the GNU Project, an attempt
to build a free operating system based on Unix, and
the Free Software Foundation, dedicated to promoting
open source software. He's also the brains behind the
GNU
General Public License, or "copylefting."
Larry
Wall wrote the first version of Perl in 1987.
Andrew Tanenbaum released Minix, upon which
Linux is based, in 1987.
David Greenman served as principal architect
on the FreeBSD
team in 1993.
Brian Behlendorf was the chief engineer of the
team that built the Apache
Web server in 1995.
|
He was not alone in this. There were a number of other peoples'
ideas hopes and aspirations he was carrying with him in his
endeavour. But that was not what was driving him at that time.
In fact Linus himself was very depreciatory of his work at
that time. What started as a unique experiment of a man who
was not satisfied with the way he found his environment and
decided to do something about it.
With the help of hundreds of volunteers the progress of Linux
continued. As the early 1.0 releases were completed and the
kernel started of boasting of features of modern software.
Parallelly continued the porting of the utilities of the GNU
project to Linux. So now we have Linux/GNU as one of the best
replacements of the standard desktop OS, Windows.
What is Linux?
Unlike commonly supposed, Linux is not the complete operating
system. Somewhat like Windows not being the total system that
you work on. Linux refers to the kernel that is run on the
system. The kernel is the most important program in the Linux
setup. It is a piece of very robust and beautifully written
code that forms the interface between every other program
and the hardwork taht lies beneath. It is the most important
component in the system, that does a number of tasks that
allow the other programs to run easily without caring too
much about various critical yet mundane tasks.
The Linux system on the other hand, that we normally refer
to as linux, is technically to be called Linux/GNU system.
The GNU is a project that was started with a view to make
the software totally free and to make it open source too.
Many of the utilities that come bundled with the standard
Linux installation are utilities written under the GNU project.
Hence the combination of GNU and Linux is responsible for
the revolution that is taking place now.
What revolution?
The trend of the PC was set by the company called Microsoft,
with the release of the dos, which was a far departure from
the existing scary entities running very powerful yet arrogant
programs. The computer till then was limited to huge monsters,
costing heaven and earth, manned by technicians, without having
a concept called user friendliness. Into such an environment,
coinciding with the advent of the smaller, cheaper, more powerful
desktop machines, the disk operating system simplified the
system so that everyone could use it. There lay the reason
for the success of the modus operandi. With a focus so blinding
on usability, somewhere along the line the basic reason for
existance was forgotten. What started as a movement for the
inclusion of the masses into computing, turned into a sorry
excuse for sloppy programming, simple uniform interfaces and
a general degradation of the entire computing cycle.
The world has seen in the form of the macintosh, an example
of slick user interfaces. It had already seen in the Unix
environment, power and stability. But under the guise of operability,
it saw excuses. The Windows operating system, has maintined
its look and feel since its first Windows 3.1 that came with
the GUI. Its release of the Windows 95, was met with looks
of astonishment by the members of the Apple tribe, who had
that kind of operability almost 10 years ago. But for a sheer
chance of location, Windows would not have made it to where
it is now.
With its single minded fanatism for easing things for the
user, Windows has done something very peculiar. It has made
the user end very easy and simple to use. It has also made
basic programming so easy, that it is now possible for non-programmers
to program too. Also with this heavy bias it has made the
actual implementation by a professional programmer ridiculously
complicated. The whole of the Windows software architecture,
is so ridden with patches and workarounds that no coherent
picture can be made of it.
The usablity also introduces an important concept of backward
compatibility. In a word this means that a windows programmer
can never leave his past behind him and move on. No matter
what he does he must support all that he has done, because
of the remote possibility that someone might be using the
software and might be inconvenienced. Add to this the sloppiness
Windows code introduces. Not only do non-programmers program,
they add to the headache of all those users of his code. The
DLL based structure, supposed to make life easier became the
trap that might just break up Windows.
This has introduced a vast intellectual gap between code
developers and the users. This has necessicated such a difference
in perception of the machine between the two, that the user
hands over his machine to the developer, completely, when
he wants to get a new program installed. With a lack of any
credible system of security, it is possible for just about
anyone to take control of a machine with a program written
to do that. Getting a new program means running an installation
program, and what it does is so transparent to the user, that
he is not even aware it the program is a beneficial one or
not. In fact even a discerning user might not have the means
to know more. The sheer bias against involving the user in
the maintanence of his own machine has led to phenomina such
as the proliferation of the virii. No one knows, behind what
interface lies what program that might be responsible for
what damage.
The proliferation of the Windows environment has also led
to a number of erroneous beliefs about the personal computer.
One of them being the idea that a PC is personal, by implication
no one else works on it, by implication no concept of previledges
or restrictions. By a furthur implication, virii and trojans
are a common place occurance, one that is to be rectified
rather than prevented. This hardly reflects reality. Even
a truly personal system is used by more than on person at
a time. And the lack of security safeguards has made it impossible
for the owner to put in place any checks to safeguard his
own machine.
A second one is the automatic acceptance of the irrationality
of the computer. "It just happens that way", is
a view a lot of Windows users keep. If restarting windows
works, then that is the best method, and the only method.
To work around a certain bug in the software, hit and miss
policies are devised and stuck to. This gives the computer
an aura of art, an aura of black magic. This makes the average
user even more dependant on the system and hence on the vagaries
of Windows.
And third, and a very serious idea, is the acceptance of
the 'fact' that crashes and instability are an integral part
of a system. Reinstalling Windows is a little trick right
on the top of the charts. This has also lead to a sheer drop
in the demands of performance of a system. "Too many
windows cause a crash" is absurd because, being a multitasking
operating system equipped with paging techniques, the Windows
system was supposed to deal with such a demanding environment.
Windows has been successful in shifting the onus of their
programming blunders onto the users of the systems.
So why have we been accepting all this? A very valid question.
There are several reasons. The first one being the fact that
Windows was there first for the desktop users. Another is
the tremendous job done by the Public Relations team at Redmond.
What today go about under the name of Internet virii, email
worms should effectivley have been named Outlook worms and
Windows virii. Any simple analysis would reveal that a host
of these problems commonly associatd with the Internet are
in fact those that occur to those with with Microsoft Software.
Further if it were not for Microsoft's carefully worded user
license agreement, which holds the company blameless for absolutely
anything, they would probably have been awash in class action
lawsuits by now.
This then is the revolution. The rebirth of the good old
days of computing in a new avatar. The reincarnation
of the power and stability of the good old Unix, on the desktop.
The taming of the shrew so to speak. What was till yesterday
a personal domain of the students of computer science is now
being opened to the people at large. In short it is a chance
for the average user to truly get the best he can afford.
It is a chance for the user to be able to use the computer
to its fullest capacity.
Does it effect me?
The development of the desktop for the Linux system is probably
the main reason that has made this revolution a distinct possibility.
Linux offers a lot, to every section of the computer user
populace.
Are you a Novice user?
You will benefit from a new user interface. Linux offers
all that you possibly want from the desktop. There are tools
that allow you to create all the requitrements of the office,
that you have been used to.The Staroffice is a suite of tools
that not only replicates all that you have been getting from
the Microsoft Office suite, but will also help you in the
process of migration by providing you with compatibility with
the existing office formats, so that you can safely convert
all your existing informatio to the new OS. There are also
applications that allow you to create presentations, create
and maintain spread sheets, and of course check mail. There
are also a host of other applications like Personal Information
Managers, that help you increase your productivity.
Are you an Inquisitive user?
You will benefit from the tremendous amout of information
that is available on the topic of Linux and the related information
about programming, and API calls etc. If you seriously do
want to learn more about the machine that you are dealing
with, Linux offers you a look beneath the hood, and lets you
unleash the power of your box. It is a hands on approach to
building your own personal machine. Also the stability of
the sytem allows you to experiment. As a user you will have
access to all those programs that are normally out of bounds
for a Windows user. You get to install and administer Web
and FTP servers, Mail servers, and a host of other applications
that help you have a glimpse of the true power of Linux. For
the icing of the cake, you will be proviledged to look at
the actual source code that runs your system.
Are you are Power user?
You will fall in love with Linux. The early Unix machines
were built with networking in mind. All application were written
without the assumption that its execution will be limited
to a single terminal, and one user. You will have a host of
application that allow web access. You will be able to run
and maintain servers for Internet usage. You will be able
to configure a variety of services that can be used by others,
even if they are those unfortunates that run Windows. Web,
mail (pop and smtp), FTP, telnet, rsh, proxy servers and others
are some of the services that can be configured to run across
networks. Given the status of Linux as an alternate Operating
System, it comes bundled with a number of tools that allow
cross platform access, including remote administration etc.
Are you are Programmer?
Inspite of what Redmond tells you, you believe, as a true,
hardcore programmer, that programming in C is the best way
to do it. Or you may indeed have imbibed in you, the classic
ways of Larry Wall. What ever be the case, Linux offers you
a programming options that compare with the best in bussiness.
That old simple program, in C, that you believed was the most
important thing to ever find its way through a keyboard, is
suddenly useful again. Not only does Linux offer one of the
richest set of API calls that an OS can offer, with the evolution
of the new graphic interfaces, it also has a number of functions
that allow you to program in the tremendously flexible and
powerful graphical interface. Tool kits such as the gtk+ allow
programmers to access the power of the GUI through native
C code. And if you though you were better off without having
to write code for all the mundane tasks like creation of interfaces
etc, Linux comes in with tools to generate the interfaces
with a click and drag approach, ala Visual Basic or Visual
C++.
Can I afford it?
A tricky question really. Depends on what you mean by afford.
But the answer can really be 'yes'.
If by 'afford' you mean the time required to change into
a new Operating System, the answer certainly depends a lot
on you as the user. There are currently a number of distributions
that make the process of installation and maintenance an easy
chore by providing user friendly and graphical interfaces
wherever possible. Work in this field still is in progress,
so even as we talk there would be newer more friendly interfaces
released that probably take user friendliness to a new level.
All said and done there do exist problems to users. Linux
still is under development. All that you get is the work of
a number of people who did it in their spare times and have
allowed you to use it for free. But it is these people who
are always available to help you. There is a lot of information
that is accessible regarding all the aspects of the Linux
system. If you can afford some time to look up and solve your
own problems, there is nothing to beat that pleasure. A little
bit of information, a little bit of spare time and a little
bit of creativity and the heart to experiment are all that
is required for you to use Linux.
If by afford you mean the price, well what can I say. Other
than the fact that whole of the Linux system is available
free of charge. Most components are available under a very
flexible licensing scheme called the GPL.
This scheme does not prevent the commercialisation of Linux
components, but provides a mechanism that will protect the
rights of the creators and at the same time allow you to tinker
with the source code. There are a number of commercial versions
also available that allow you to order a linux distribution
at a very reasonable price (Unlike the heaven and earth you
have to pay for those from Redmond) and also provide you with
a limited amont of after sales service too.
When do I start... now?
You do not need to be an expert to use Windows. At the same
time no matter how much you use Windows, you will never be
called an expert. This is because the Windows environment
was not created to give you expertise of any kind. Again you
do not need to be an expert to start using Linux, but once
you are done with it, you will be one hell of an expert.
.
|